Page 1 of 1

Are updated versions of Freestyler more CPU intensive?

Posted: 22 Mar 2010, 21:51
by djharryg
As you can see by my signature, I'm still using version 3.0.1. It seems very stable for me.

Should I update to the newest version of Freestyler? Do the newer versions of Freestyler use more CPU resources?

Does anyone have any reviews about the newer versions? Are they working well?

I LOVE Freestyler. I'm just afraid to update if it's working okay.

Someone convince me to update! 8-)

Re: Are updated versions of Freestyler more CPU intensive?

Posted: 22 Mar 2010, 22:10
by dmxlighting
Its up to you.
There are some benifits to upgrading but if your install is working fine and you are happy then thats good.
I don't think it will cause any problems for you to upgrade. There are a few new features which could be of use to you ?
Have a look at the FS history - http://www.freestylersupport.com/wiki/what_s_new , and see if its worth it for you.
The latest FS release will not use any more resources of you PC than the version you are currently on.

:fs:

Re: Are updated versions of Freestyler more CPU intensive?

Posted: 23 Mar 2010, 08:19
by remco_k
djharryg wrote: As you can see by my signature, I'm still using version 3.0.1. It seems very stable for me.
I often use this old saying: Don't change a winning team
... But you can try to find out if it gets better. If not, restore. So make sure you have a backup of everything (FreeStyler app or setup, sequences, fixtures...)
Should I update to the newest version of Freestyler? Do the newer versions of Freestyler use more CPU resources?
I think one can answer that question with no. Maybe the newer versions even use less CPU resourses. One big CPU saver is the new Sound to light module that replaced the old (very CPU intensive -> 100% in many cases) sound to light module. Since FreeStyler version 3.2 the new S2L module is installed by default. Having better beat detection and the beta's of the S2L module have many more extra's to play with.
So, if you are a user of the sound to light module, you'll have a benefit without a doubt if you upgrade.
For info about that S2L: http://www.digiplay.nl/fs
Does anyone have any reviews about the newer versions? Are they working well?
As with any software package: every new version has its whims. Especially with initial new versions and beta's.
So thats why you should just try. Everyone is using FreeStyler his own way. That way problems do arise, or do not.
I think the current newer FreeStyler release versions are pretty good (>=3.2), better than previous releases. Together with other forum users we've pointed out quite a few problems that are solved. So, in general you could say: newer is better.
I LOVE Freestyler. I'm just afraid to update if it's working okay.
Just try. Don't forget to make a backup, test if you can restore (e.g. to another computer) before you install the new version. That way you are sure you are able to go back to your good old version if necessary. But I think you'll be happy with the new version... :)

Re: Are updated versions of Freestyler more CPU intensive?

Posted: 23 Mar 2010, 19:04
by Onge
Very good advice there remco_k :D

Re: Are updated versions of Freestyler more CPU intensive?

Posted: 23 Mar 2010, 19:06
by djharryg
I agree. Great advice. I updated one of my laptops to 3.2.8. Just gotta figure out the new S2L module. Looks really cool.